Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àλóäµæ¹æ¹ý°ú ¹æÇâ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÀλóüÀÇ Á¤¹Ð¼º°ú üÀû ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON ACCUARACY AND DIMENSIONAL STABILITY ACCORDING TO IMPRESSION METHODS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 37±Ç 5È£ p.567 ~ 580
ÀÌÀ翵, ÀÓÁÖȯ, Á¶ÀÎÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀ翵 ( Lee Jae-Young ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÓÁÖȯ ( Lim Ju-Hwan ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶ÀÎÈ£ ( Cho In-Ho ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Accurate reproduction of intraoral tissue is essential in the fabrication of fixed prosthesis. This selection of impression material and method is very important. In this study, vinyl polysiloxane type impression material Panasil was used. Three impression methods ; one-step technique, individual tray technique, and individual tooth tray technique using the vinyl polysiloxane type bite registration material Futar Occlusion, were used to take horizontal and vertical impression. Improved stone models were fabricated. The amount of occlusal surface discrepaneies, interabutment distance discrepancies, amount of marginal defect were evaluated with the X-PLAN360d and photoscanning. The results were as follows. 1. There was no significant difference in occlusal surface according to the directions and techniques of impression taking. 2. There was no significant difference in interabutment distance discrepancies according to the directions and techniques of impression taking 3. There was no significant difference in marginal discrepancies according to the direction of impression taking but there was significant difference between one-step technique and individual tray technique, individual tooth tray technique (P<0.05). Taken together, these results suggest that individual tray technique and individual tooth tray technique are more accurate for impression taking than one-step technique.

Å°¿öµå

Futar Occlusion; Impression methods; Individual tooth tray technique; Individual tray techique; One-step technique

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed